That they did. But almost all of it came in the last 3 quarters. They hadn't done much of anything in the 1st and it was still 0-0 after that. Then they made changes like Spuds said and it was over. That's the mark of a good coaching staff.
Printable View
That they did. But almost all of it came in the last 3 quarters. They hadn't done much of anything in the 1st and it was still 0-0 after that. Then they made changes like Spuds said and it was over. That's the mark of a good coaching staff.
Gate city also played some great defense, and they got more turn-overs than they gave up. Ethan still threw for 120+ (just throwing facts out there)
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Vic Fontaine</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That they did. But almost all of it came in the last 3 quarters. They hadn't done much of anything in the 1st and it was still 0-0 after that. Then they made changes like Spuds said and it was over. That's the mark of a good coaching staff. </div></div>
Not the 4th Clintwoods subs did not move the ball well at all
Clintwood moved the ball well the 1st Qtr there first Drive ended on a 1st from the 6 that was a bad option pitch
Appy did force a 3 and out on Clintwoods 2nd series but that was preatty much it for D stops until the 4th qtr
IMHO, whoever controls the line of scrimmage will win the game. Which side comes off the ball the low & hard determines if the play is successful or not. It all starts with the line. If I were Clintwood, The way Burton comes off the ball (quick & aggressive) is what would worry me the most. Again, my opinion.
What were these offensive changes, Spuds? I didn't notice anything. They went through Appy like a hot knife through butter, Robinson twisted his ankle and went out for a few plays to get retaped, they pitch to Osbourne on the first play 6 yards from a td and it was a fumble. After Appy 3 and outed and punted for the second series they were still taping Robinson. Was that the changes, him coming back in the game?